Genetic Subtypes and Pretreatment Drug Resistance in the Newly Reported Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Men Aged≥50 Years Old in Guangxi / 中国医学科学院学报

Objective To analyze the genetic subtypes of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the prevalence of pretreatment drug resistance in the newly reported HIV-infected men in Guangxi. Methods The stratified random sampling method was employed to select the newly reported HIV-infected men aged≥50 years old in 14 cities of Guangxi from January to June in 2020.The pol gene of HIV-1 was amplified by nested reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and then sequenced.The mutation sites associated with drug resistance and the degree of drug resistance were then analyzed. Results A total of 615 HIV-infected men were included in the study.The genetic subtypes of CRF01_AE,CRF07_BC,and CRF08_BC accounted for 57.4% (353/615),17.1% (105/615),and 22.4% (138/615),respectively.The mutations associated with the resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI),non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI),and protease inhibitors occurred in 8 (1.3%),18 (2.9%),and 0 patients,respectively.M184V (0.7%) and K103N (1.8%) were the mutations with the highest occurrence rates for the resistance to NRTIs and NNRTIs,respectively.Twenty-two (3.6%) patients were resistant to at least one type of inhibitors.Specifically,4 (0.7%),14 (2.3%),4 (0.7%),and 0 patients were resistant to NRTIs,NNRTIs,both NRTIs and NNRTIs,and protease inhibitors,respectively.The pretreatment resistance to NNRTIs had much higher frequency than that to NRTIs (2.9% vs.1.3%;χ2=3.929,P=0.047).The prevalence of pretreatment resistance to lamivudine,zidovudine,tenofovir,abacavir,rilpivirine,efavirenz,nevirapine,and lopinavir/ritonavir was 0.8%, 0.3%, 0.7%, 1.0%, 1.3%, 2.8%, 2.9%, and 0, respectively. Conclusions CRF01_AE,CRF07_BC,and CRF08_BC are the three major strains of HIV-infected men≥50 years old newly reported in Guangxi,2020,and the pretreatment drug resistance demonstrates low prevalence.

Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid) para el tratamiento de pacientes con COVID-19: [2 de julio de 2022] / Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid) for the treatment of patients with COVID-19: [July 2, 2022]

INTRODUCCIÓN: El nirmatrelvir es un inhibidor de la proteasa biodisponible por vía oral que es activo frente a MPRO, una proteasa viral que desempeña un papel esencial en la replicación viral al escindir las 2 poliproteínas virales.15 Ha demostrado actividad antiviral frente a todos los coronavirus que se sabe que infectan a los humanos.16 El nirmatrelvir es empaquetado con ritonavir (como Paxlovid), un inhibidor del citocromo P450 (CYP) 3A4 y agente potenciador farmacocinético que se ha utilizado para potenciar los inhibidores de la proteasa del VIH. Se requiere la coadministración de ritonavir para aumentar las concentraciones de nirmatrelvir al rango terapéutico objetivo. OBJETIVO: El objetivo del presente informe es evaluar parámetros de eficacia, seguridad, conveniencia y recomendaciones disponibles acerca del empleo de nirmatrelvir-ritonavir para el tratamiento de pacientes con COVID-19 en Argentina. MÉTODOS: Efectos en la Salud: Se desarrolló un protocolo sustentado en proyectos que resume activamente la evidencia científica a medida que la misma se hace disponible. Con este fin se utilizó la plataforma Love de Epistemonikos para identificar revisiones sistemáticas "vivas". Implementación: Este dominio contempla dos subdominios: la existencia de barreras y facilitadores en nuestro contexto para la implementación de la tecnología evaluada no consideradas en los otros dominios analizados, y los costos comparativos en relación con otras intervenciones similares. Con el objetivo de emitir un juicio de valor sobre la magnitud de dichos costos, en pacientes hospitalizados se utilizó como comparador al tratamiento con dexametasona, que ha demostrado ser una intervención accesible y de beneficios importantes en el contexto analizado. Recomendaciones: Para la identificación de recomendaciones sustentadas en evidencia y actualizadas, se utilizó la plataforma COVID recmap. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron dos sistemáticas que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión del presente informe. Se identificó un ECA que incluyó 2085 pacientes en los que nirmatrelvir-ritonavir se comparó con el tratamiento estándar en pacientes con COVID-19. CONCLUSIONES: El cuerpo de la evidencia muestra que nirmatrelvir-ritonavir tiene un efecto incierto sobre la mortalidad en pacientes con COVID-19 leve o moderada de reciente comienzo, con factores de riesgo para progresar a enfermedad grave que no han sido vacunados. En esta población, probablemente disminuya la necesidad de hospitalización sin aumentar los eventos adversos severos. Esta tecnología no ha sido probada en personas vacunadas ni en otros escenarios. La tecnología no está autorizada para su comercialización por la Administración Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología Médica (ANMAT) de nuestro país. Aunque la forma de administración oral es simple, la experiencia en otros países muestra que el costo estimado es elevado siendo la población objetivo muy grande. Hay incertidumbre sobre si podrían existir además problemas de suministro que afecten la disponibilidad y la equidad en la distribución. Las guías de práctica clínica de alta calidad metodológica actualizadas incluidas tenderían a recomendar el tratamiento. Aquellas que recomiendan en forma condicional a favor se basan en el beneficio observado en personas de muy alto riesgo no vacunadas con enfermedad de reciente comienzo, y su facilidad de administración. Las que entregan recomendaciones en contra se basan en el costo comparativo muy elevado, para una población objetivo muy amplia y la baja certeza en su efecto sobre la mortalidad.

Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid) para el tratamiento de pacientes con COVID-19: [17 de marzo de 2022] / Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid) for the treatment of patients with COVID-19: [March 17, 2022]

INTRODUCCIÓN: El nirmatrelvir es un inhibidor de la proteasa que se administra por vía oral, que demostró ser activo frente a MPRO, una proteasa viral que desempeña un papel esencial en la replicación viral al escindir las 2 poliproteínas virales. 15 Además, ha demostrado actividad antiviral frente a todos los coronavirus que se sabe que infectan a los humanos. 16 El nirmatrelvir es empaquetado con ritonavir (como Paxlovid), un inhibidor del citocromo P450 (CYP) 3A4 y agente potenciador farmacocinético, que se ha utilizado para potenciar los inhibidores de la proteasa del virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH). La coadministración tiene como objetivo aumentar las concentraciones de nirmatrelvir al rango terapéutico objetivo. El 22 de diciembre de 2021, la Administración de Alimentos y Medicamentos (FDA, su siglas en inglés Food and Drug Administration) emitió una autorización de uso de emergencia para nirmatrelvir potenciado con ritonavir para el tratamiento de pacientes con COVID-19 leve a moderado de ≥12 años y un peso de ≥ 40 kg que están dentro de los 5 días de inicio de los síntomas y con alto riesgo de progresar a enfermedad grave. 17,18 Administración Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología Médica (ANMAT) aún no ha autorizado la comercialización del medicamento para este fin. OBJETIVO: El objetivo del presente informe es evaluar parámetros de eficacia, seguridad, conveniencia y recomendaciones disponibles acerca del empleo de nirmatrelvir-ritonavir para el tratamiento de pacientes con COVID-19 en Argentina. MÉTODOS: Teniendo en cuenta la velocidad con la que la información relacionada con la pandemia aparece y se modifica (link), se desarrolló un protocolo sustentado en proyectos que resume activamente la evidencia científica a medida que la misma se hace disponible. Con este fin se utilizó la plataforma L- ove de Epistemonikos para identificar revisiones sistemáticas "vivas". Se seleccionaron aquellas con una calidad metodológica apropiada evaluada a través de la herramienta AMSTAR-2, y que a su vez llevaran un proceso de actualización frecuente.19 De cada una de las revisiones sistemáticas identificadas se extractaron los efectos de la intervención sobre los desenlaces priorizados como importantes o críticos y la certeza en dichos efectos. Para la priorización de los desenlaces se adoptó una perspectiva desde el paciente considerando sus potenciales preferencias. La selección se realizó por consenso entre los autores y supervisores del informe considerando los resultados de múltiples ejercicios de priorización publicados, realizados en el marco del desarrollo de distintas guías de práctica clínica.20­23 Se seleccionaron "mortalidad", "ingreso en asistencia ventilatoria mecánica", "tiempo hasta resolución de síntomas", "hospitalización", "eventos adversos graves" como desenlaces críticos. Adicionalmente, se extractaron datos relacionados con efectos de subgrupo potencialmente relevantes para la toma de decisión, con especial énfasis en el tiempo de evolución, la severidad de la enfermedad y el estado de vacunación. En los casos en que no fue reportado por las revisiones sistemáticas incluidas, se calculó el efecto absoluto de las intervenciones en pacientes vacunados, tomando el riesgo basal reportado para pacientes no vacunados multiplicado por un riesgo relativo de 0,1 según el efecto de la vacunación observado en distintos estudios y sistemas de vigilancia.24­26 Para confeccionar las conclusiones en el efecto de las intervenciones evaluadas sobre los desenlaces priorizados, utilizamos lineamientos publicados, específicamente desarrollados a tal fin. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron dos sistemáticas que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión del presente informe y reportaron resultados: Se identificó un ECA que incluyó 2.085 pacientes en los que nirmatrelvir-ritonavir se comparó con el tratamiento estándar en pacientes con COVID-19. Se describen los efectos absolutos y la certeza en dichos efectos de nirmatrelvir-ritonavir para pacientes con COVID-19. Los pacientes incluidos en el estudio no habían recibido un esquema completo de vacunación, por lo que no se realizó un análisis de subgrupos según el estado de vacunación. Sin embargo, un análisis de subgrupo según la presencia o no de anticuerpos anti SARS-CoV-2 en suero al momento de ingresar al estudio sugiere que los beneficios observados podrían ser mayores, o incluso limitarse, para aquellos pacientes que no posean inmunidad previa. Luego de la aprobación de emergencia por la FDA de nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovir), el Departamento de Salud de los Estados Unidos estimó que tendrá distribuidos para el mes de marzo de 2022, a través del Organismo de Emergencia Pública en Salud, un total de 513.830 dosis a un costo unitario de 520 USD por 5 días de tratamiento; llevando a un gasto total de más de 266 millones de dólares (266.760 000 USD).32,33 La tecnología no está autorizada aún para su comercialización en Argentina para su uso en personas con COVID-19. La vía de administración oral podría asociarse con mayor facilidad de uso; sin embargo, no se conoce la disponibilidad del laboratorio para responder a la demanda sin afectar la equidad en la distribución en nuestro país. CONCLUSIONES: El cuerpo de la evidencia muestra que nirmatrelvir-ritonavir tiene un efecto incierto sobre la mortalidad en pacientes con COVID-19 leve o moderada de reciente comienzo, con factores de riesgo para progresar a enfermedad grave que no han sido vacunados. En esta población, probablemente disminuya la necesidad de hospitalización sin aumentar los eventos adversos severos. Esta tecnología no ha sido probada en personas vacunadas ni en otros escenarios. La tecnología no está autorizada para su comercialización por la Administración Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología Médica (ANMAT) de nuestro país. Aunque la forma de administración oral es simple, la experiencia en otros países muestra que el costo comparativo estimado es elevado, la población objetivo es muy alta y podrían existir además problemas de suministro y distribución que afecten la disponibilidad y la equidad en la distribución. Las guías de práctica clínica de alta calidad metodológica actualizadas entregan recomendaciones discordantes en cuanto a su uso. Aquellas que recomiendan en forma condicional a favor se basan en el beneficio observado en personas de muy alto riesgo, no vacunadas, con enfermedad de reciente comienzo, y su facilidad de administración. Las que entregan recomendaciones en contra se basan en el costo comparativo muy elevado, para una población objetivo muy amplia y la baja certeza en su efecto sobre la mortalidad.

Tratamiento Covid-19 / Covid-19 treatment

The main treatment for patients with severe Covid-19 is to maintain adequate ventilatory support and monitor the possible progression of the disease. Therapeutic strategies such as High Flow Nasal Cannula, awake prone position, antithrombotic prophylaxis and the use of dexamethasone. There have improved the probability of not presenting complications and not requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. The use of convalescent plasma is still under investigation and is currently only recommended in clinical trials. Finding antivirals that allow treating the infection and clinically improving patients has led to mounting studies with different methodologies, and currently there are specific and limited indications for their routine use, as in the case of Remdesivir, which has been approved by the FDA as emergency treatment in severe cases. Immunomodulatory treatments are still under study. An example of this is Tocilizumab and Anakinra, which have shown promising results for the management of seriously ill patients. It should be noted that there are many therapies that are being tested and that every day the information about the results obtained is changing. (AU)

High-throughput screening identifies established drugs as SARS-CoV-2 PLpro inhibitors

A new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has been identified as the etiologic agent for the COVID-19 outbreak. Currently, effective treatment options remain very limited for this disease; therefore, there is an urgent need to identify new anti-COVID-19 agents. In this study, we screened over 6,000 compounds that included approved drugs, drug candidates in clinical trials, and pharmacologically active compounds to identify leads that target the SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease (PLpro). Together with main protease (M

Safety of protease inhibitors and Arbidol for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Zhejiang Province, China / 浙江大学学报（英文版）（B辑：生物医学和生物技术）

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of an antiviral regimen of protease inhibitors combined with Arbidol (umifenovir) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia patients. The genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 is highly homologous to that of SARS-CoV (Zhou et al., 2020). Previously published basic and clinical research on anti-SARS-CoV treatment found that lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) could improve the prognosis of SARS patients (Chan et al., 2003; Chu et al., 2004). Darunavir (DRV) is another protease inhibitor that blocks the binding of SARS-CoV-2 to human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (Omotuyi et al., 2020). The broad-spectrum antiviral drug Arbidol (umifenovir) also shows in vitro anti-SARS-CoV activity (Khamitov et al., 2008).

Hora de analizar la evidencia de izquierda a derecha / It is time to analyze the evidence from left to right

En este artículo, el autor reflexiona sobre las expectativas de los profesionales de la salud acerca de la evidencia para recomendar tratamiento farmacológico a los pacientes con COVID-19. (AU)

In this article, the author reflects on the expectations of health professionals regarding the evidence to recommend pharmacological treatment to patients with COVID-19. (AU)

Relevancia clínica de las interacciones medicamentosas en pacientes infectados con el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana: actualización 2015-2017 / The clinical relevance of drug interactions in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection: update 2015-2017

Resumen Introducción: La farmacocinética de los anti-retrovirales (ARVs) puede ser modificada por otros medicamentos de uso concomitante. Es oportuno actualizar las interacciones entre nuevos ARVs y fármacos de uso crónico para mantener un éxito terapéutico. Objetivo: Actualizar información sobre interacciones medicamentosas en pacientes con infección por VIH/SIDA en terapia antiretroviral. Método: Revisión estructurada en MEDLINE/ PubMed utilizando los términos Mesh: Anti-retroviral agents and drug interactions or herb-drug interactions or food-drug interactions, entre enero de 2015 y junio de 2017. Fueron seleccionadas publicaciones sobre interacciones medicamentosas en humanos, en inglés o español y con acceso a texto completo. Además, se incluyeron referencias de artículos considerados relevantes. La inclusión de los artículos fue evaluada por tres investigadores independientes y, en caso de requerirlo, por consenso entre ellos. La relevancia clínica se estableció, acorde con la gravedad y probabilidad de ocurrencia de la interacción. Resultados: Se identificaron 466 artículos, se accedió a texto completo a 444. De éstos, 164 aportaron interacciones, lo que permitió identificar un total de 534 parejas de interacciones medicamentosas. Las interacciones que presentaron un mayor riesgo de generar problemas de seguridad y efectividad fueron 308 (57,7%) de nivel 2 y 35 (6,6%) de nivel 1. Conclusiones: Se identifican 534 parejas nuevas de interacciones medicamentosas, de ellas 308 (64,2%) de mayor relevancia clínica.

Background: The pharmacokinetics of anti-retrovirals (ARVs) can be modified by other concomitant medicinal products. It is timely to update the interactions between new ARVs and drugs of chronic use to maintain therapeutic success. Aim: To update information about drug interactions in patients with HIV/AIDS on antiretroviral therapy. Methods: Comprehensive literature review in MEDLINE/PubMed database from January of 2015 to June of 2017, using the Mesh terms: Anti-retroviral agents and drug interactions or herb-drug interactions or food-drug interactions. Publications with drug interactions in humans, in English or Spanish, and with full text were retrieved. Additionally, citation lists from identified articles were reviewed. The study inclusion was assessed by three independent researchers and by consensus among them when was necessary. Clinical relevance of drug interaction was grouped into levels according to seriously and probability of occurrence. Results: 466 articles were identified; full text was accessed in 444. Of these, 164 provided interactions, which allowed the identification of a total of 534 pairs of drug interactions. The interactions that presented a higher risk of generating safety and effectiveness problems were 308 (57.7%) of level 2 and 35 (6.6%) of level 1. Conclusions: We identify 534 new pairs of drug interactions, of which 308 (64.2%) are the most clinically relevant.

Effectiveness and safety of protease inhibitors for the hepatitis C treatment in a hospital of South Brazil: real life data

The combination of Inhibitors of protease boceprevir (BOC) or telaprevir (TLV) concomitantly with peginterferon (PEG) and ribavirin (RBV) constitute the triple therapy (TT) for Hepatitis C treatment. Objective: To describe the experience of the TT treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients, besides discussing safety issues, in real life. Methods: Observational and retrospective study with 180 patients attended in a specialized center, between July 2014 and December 2015. Were evaluated variables as gender, age, access to drugs, pattern of alcohol consumption, pathway of contamination reported by the patient, previous treatment, degree of fibrosis, treatment regimen, treatment interruption and reason and Sustained Viral Response (SVR). Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) were collect through monthly self-report by the patient to the pharmacist. Results: 65 patients used BOC and 115 TLV, and the mean age was 54.20 (BOC) and 53.92 (TLV) years. End of treatment rate was 52.3% (BOC) and 53.3% (TLV). ADRs occurred in 18.5% of the patients (BOC) and 13.9% (TLV), being more frequent the severe anemia. Erythropoietin (EPO) used in 45.4% (BOC) and 58.2% (TLV). SVR rate calculated by intention to treat was 38.5% (BOC) e 50.4% (TLV). Conclusion: This study has shown that the effectiveness of TT is not significantly higher than double therapy and is lower than the reported in clinical trials. High dropout rates due to ADRs have been demonstrated, as well as a lower SVR found in clinical trials.(AU)

Ergotismo y VIH: el riesgo de la automedicación / Ergotism and HIV: the risk of self-medication

El ergotismo es una complicación bien conocida, aunque poco fre-cuente, asociada a la ingesta de derivados de la ergotamina en dosis habitualmente más altas de las recomendadas. No obstante, también puede presentarse luego del uso de bajas dosis cuando se adminis-tran concomitantemente drogas que inhiben su metabolismo, entre ellas los inhibidores de proteasa (IP), ampliamente utilizados en el tra-tamiento de pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficien-cia humana (VIH). A pesar de esta interacción predecible se siguen observando en la práctica clínica diaria casos de ergotismo, probable-mente debido a que se trata de una droga de uso frecuente, bajo cos-to y que no requiere prescripción médica, sumado a la falta de conoci-miento del paciente de las potenciales interacciones. Se describen las características, diagnóstico, tratamiento y evolución de cuatro pacien-tes con infección por VIH en tratamiento antirretroviral (TARV), basa-do en IP, que presentaron un cuadro de ergotismo

Ergotism is a well-known but rare complication associated with the intake of ergotamine derivatives at doses usually higher than recommended. However, it may also occur after low doses of ergotamine when it is co-administered with drugs that inhibit its metabolism, such as protease inhibitors (PIs), widely used in the treatment of patients with human immunodeficiency virus. Despite this predictable interaction, cases of ergotism are still being observed in daily clinical practice, probably because it is a frequently used, low cost drug that does not require medical prescription, in addition to the patient's lack of knowledge of the potential interactions. We describe here the characteristics, diagnosis, treatment and evolution of four HIV-infected patients on PI-based antiretroviral treatment who presented a clinical picture of ergotism

Curing Chronic Hepatitis C: A Cost Comparison of the Combination Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir vs. Protease-Inhibitor-Based Triple Therapy

ABSTRACT Introduction. Interferon-free, multi-direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is highly effective and well tolerated, but costly. To gain perspective on the evolving economics of HCV therapy, we compared the cost per cure of a multi-DAA regimen with the prior standard of triple therapy. Material and methods. Patients infected with HCV genotype 1 who were treated through the University of Colorado Hepatology Clinic between May 2011 and December 2014 comprised the study population. The multi-DAA regimen of simeprevir plus sofosbuvir (SMV/SOF) was compared to the triple therapy regimen consisting of peginterferon and ribavirin, with either boceprevir or telaprevir (TT). Sustained-virologic response (SVR) rates, total costs per treatment and adverse events were recorded. Total cost per SVR were compared for the two treatments, controlling for patient demographics and clinical characteristics. Results. One hundred eighty-three patients received SMV/SOF (n = 70) or TT (n = 113). Patients receiving SMV/SOF were older, more treatment experienced, and had a higher stage of fibrosis. SVRs were 86% and 59%, average total costs per patient were $152,775 and $95,943, and average total costs per SVR were $178,237 vs. $161,813.49 for SMV/SOF and TT groups, respectively. Medication costs accounted for 98% of SMV/SOF and 85% of TT treatment costs. Conclusion. The high cure rate of multi-DAA treatment of HCV is offset by the high costs of the DAAs, such that the cost per cure from TT to multi-DAA therapy has been relatively constant. In order to cure more patients, either additional financial resources will need to be allocated to the treatment of HCV or drug costs will need to be reduced.

Cribado, diagnóstico y tratamiento de la hepatitis por virus C en la práctica clínica / Screening, diagnosis and treatment of chronic hepatitis C in clinical practice

La hepatitis crónica por el virus de la hepatitis C (HCV) es un problema de salud mundial. En el mundo, 170 millones de personas están infectadas. En Latinoamérica la prevalencia se estima entre 1.0 y 2.3% y en Argentina es en promedio 1.0 a 1.5%. La eficacia del tratamiento de esta enfermedad ha mejorado sustancialmente en los últimos 2 a 3 años. Con los nuevos antivirales de acción directa (AAD) disponibles actualmente, pueden lograrse tasas de respuesta viral sostenida (RVS) mayores al 90-95% prácticamente con pocos efectos adversos. Para poder acceder a estos tratamientos con una alta tasa de curación, y así lograr reducir la carga de la enfermedad en la salud pública, es necesario aumentar el número de pacientes diagnosticados y que estos accedan a un cuidado adecuado. El rol de los médicos de atención primaria es fundamental: deben sospechar la infección, diagnosticarla y complementar su atención con la derivación al especialista. El trabajo conjunto de generalistas y especialistas optimizará el manejo de los recursos disponibles, permitiendo que cada vez más personas infectadas con el HCV sean diagnosticadas y tratadas adecuadamente.

Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) is a global health problem. Worldwide, 170 million people are chronically infected. In Latin America its prevalence is estimated between 1.0 and 2.3%, and in Argentina between 1.0 and 1.5%. Treatment efficacy has considerably improved in the last 2 or 3 years. Sustained virological response (SVR) rates around 90-95% can be achieved with the new direct acting antiviral agents (DAAs) currently available, with few side effects. It is necessary to increase the number of diagnosed patients, linking them to adequate management and treatment. Raising treatment rates will increase the percentage of cured patients, reducing the burden of disease. Primary care physicians´ role is essential to achieve this goal. They must identify persons at risk, diagnose them and work with specialists to continue their medical care. Team working of generalists and specialists will permit that more HCV infected people can access to adequate care and treatment.

Recent Advances in Management of Acute Pancreatitis / 대한소화기학회지

Acute pancreatitis is common but remains a condition with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite a better understanding of the pathophysiology of acute pancreatitis achieved during the past few decades, there is no specific pharmacologic entity available. Therefore, supportive care is still the mainstay of treatment. Recently, novel interventions for increasing survival and minimizing morbidity have been investigated, which are highlighted in this review.

Tratamento da hepatite crônica pelo vírus C: Novas perspectivas / Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus: new perspectives

A infecção pelo vírus da hepatite C (HCV) é importante causa de hepatite crônica, cirrose e carcinoma hepatocelular, sendo razão para a indicação de transplante hepático no mundo industrializado (Sherlock, 1995). Várias estratégias de tratamento da hepatite C foram empregadas ao longo dos últimos anos. O interferon peguilado em monoterapia ou combinado à ribavirina tornou-se tratamento padrão. Em 2011, foram introduzidos os inibidores de protease. Em dezembro de 2013, uma nova geração de drogas tem conferido resultados auspiciosos à terapia.

The hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) is an important cause of chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, which leads indication for liver transplantation in the industrialized world (Sherlock, 1995). Many treatment strategies for hepatitis C were used for the latest years. Pegylated interferon monotherapy or combined to the ribavirin became a standard treatment. In 2011, protease inhibitors were introduced. In December 2013, a new generation drugs have been presented auspicious results to the therapy.

Emerging Therapies for Hepatitis C

The combination of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV), the current therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, has saved the lives of many HCV-infected patients. Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) target several sites of HCV nonstructural proteins, resulting in the cessation of viral replication. The first NS3/4A protease inhibitors consisted of boceprevir and telaprevir, which have shown superior efficacy against genotype 1 HCV infection when combined with PEG-IFN/RBV compared with the standard therapy in both treatment-naive and -experienced patients. Simeprevir, faldaprevir, and asunaprevir are second-wave, first-generation NS3/4A inhibitors that have already been or will soon be approved. Second-generation protease inhibitors are in clinical trials. Daclatasvir is the first approved DAA belonging to the class of NS5A replication complex inhibitors. The potency of daclatasvir is very high, and this drug is an important and essential component of combination regimens for all genotypes. Sofosbuvir, the first approved NS5B polymerase inhibitor, is characterized by high potency and genetic barriers to resistance. Sofosbuvir combined with RBV achieved an interferon-free regimen in genotype 2 or 3 patients with a reduced treatment duration. It can also be used in combination with PEG-IFN/RBV in genotype 1 patients for 12 weeks. DAAs have provided new hope for curing HCV infections with a short treatment duration and acceptable adverse events.

Protease inhibitors in potential drug development for leishmaniasis.

Leishmaniasis is a deadly protozoan parasitic disease affecting millions of people worldwide. The treatment strategy of Leishmania infection depends exclusively on chemotherapy till date. But the treatment of the disease is greatly hampered due to high cost, toxicity of the available drugs and more importantly emergence of drug resistance. Hence the potential new drugs are highly needed to combat this disease. The first and foremost step of the drug discovery process is to search and select the putative target in a specific biological pathway in the parasite that should be either unambiguously absent in the host or considerably different from the host homolog. Importantly, Leishmania genome sequences enrich our knowledge about Leishmania and simultaneously reinforce us to identify the ideal drug targets that distinctly exist in the parasite as well as to develop the effective drugs for leishmaniasis. Though the leishmanial research has significantly progressed during the past two decades, the identification of suitable drug targets or development of effective drugs to combat leishmaniasis is far from satisfactory. Enzymatic systems of Leishmania metabolic and biochemical pathways are essential for their survival and infection. Concurrently, it is noteworthy that Leishmania proteases, especially the cysteine proteases, metalloproteases and serine proteases have been extensively investigated and found to be indispensable for the survival of the parasites and disease pathogenesis. Herein, we have discussed the importance of few enzymes, particularly the Leishmania proteases and their inhibitors as promising candidates for potential development of anti-leishmanial drugs.

Massa óssea em crianças e adolescentes que vivem com vírus da imunodeficiência humana / Bone mass in children and adolescents infected with human immunodeficiency virus

OBJETIVO: Descrever a densidade mineral óssea (DMO) e conteúdo mineral ósseo (CMO) de crianças e adolescentes que vivem com o vírus da imunodeficiência humana e comparar com os dados do National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey IV (NHANES IV). MÉTODO: Participaram do estudo48 crianças e adolescentes (sete a 17 anos de idade) com infecção pelo vírus da imunodeficiência humana adquirida por transmissão vertical. A DMO e o CMO foram mensurados pela absorciometria por dupla emissão de raios-X, calculando-se escores-z com base nos dados do NHANES IV. Nos prontuários médicos foram obtidas as informações dos parâmetros clínicos e laboratoriais da infecção pelo vírus da imunodeficiência humana. Foram ainda avaliada a atividade física, a ingestão de cálcio e a maturação esquelética. Utilizaram-se procedimentos da estatística descritiva e inferencial, estabelecendo níveis de significância de 5%. RESULTADOS :Os pacientes soropositivos demonstraram valores inferiores comparados aos dados do NHANES IV em todos os escores-z da massa óssea (média = -0,52 a -1,22, dp = 0,91 e 0,84, respectivamente). Com base no z-DMOsubtotal, há uma prevalência de 16,7% de crianças e adolescentes com massa óssea reduzida para a idade. Indivíduos que utilizaram inibidores de protease apresentaram um z-DMOtotal inferior, comparado ao grupo que não utilizou (-1,31 vs. -0,79; p = 0,02). Não foram encontradas diferenças na massa óssea em relação ao nível de atividade física e ingestão de cálcio. CONCLUSÕES: Na presente amostra, crianças e adolescentes que vivem com o vírus da imuno deficiência humana possuem baixa massa óssea para idade, e o uso de inibidores de protease parece estar relacionado a tais reduções.

OBJECTIVE: To describe bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) in children and adolescents infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and to compare them with data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey IV (NHANES IV). METHOD: The study included 48 children and adolescents (7 to 17 years old) infected with HIV through vertical transmission. BMC and BMD were measured by dual energy absorptiometry X-ray, by calculating z-scores based on data from NHANES IV. The information on clinical and laboratory parameters of infection by HIV was obtained from medical records. Physical activity, calcium intake, and skeletal maturation were also assessed. Descriptive and inferential statistical procedures were used, with levels of significance set at 5%. RESULTS: Seropositive patients presented lower values compared to data from NHANES IV in all z-scores of bone mass (mean = -0.52 to -1.22, SD = 0.91 and 0.84, respectively). Based on the subtotal z-BMD, there was a prevalence of 16.7% of children and adolescents with low bone mass for age. Individuals using protease inhibitors presented a lower total z-BMD when compared to the group that did not use (-1.31 vs. -0.79, p = 0.02). There were no bone mass differences in relation to physical activity and calcium intake. CONCLUSIONS: In the present sample children and adolescents living with HIV have low bone mass for age, and the use of protease inhibitors appears to be related to such decreases.

Primary resistance of HIV to antiretrovirals among individuals recently diagnosed at voluntary counselling and testing centres in the metropolitan region of Recife, Pernambuco

Determining the prevalence and type of antiretroviral (ARV) resistance among ARV-naïve individuals is important to assess the potential responses of these individuals to first-line regimens. The prevalence of primary resistance and the occurrence of recent infections among individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) were identified among recently diagnosed patients at five sexually transmitted disease/AIDS testing and counselling centres in the metropolitan region of Recife (RMR), Pernambuco, Brazil, between 2007-2009. One-hundred and eight samples were analysed using the Calypte® BED assay. Males predominated (56%), as did patients aged 31-50 years. Twenty-three percent presented evidence of a recent HIV infection. The median CD4+ T lymphocyte count was 408 cells/mm³ and the median viral load was 3.683 copies/mL. The prevalence of primary resistance was 4.6% (confidence interval 95% = 1-8.2%) based on criteria that excluded common polymorphisms in accordance with the surveillance drug resistance mutation criteria. The prevalence of resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase, nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase and protease inhibitors were 3.8%, 1.5% and 0.8%, respectively. Fifty-seven percent of strains were from clade B, 37.7% were clade F and 3.1% were clade C; there were no statistically significant differences with respect to resistance between clades. Recent infection tended to be more common in men (p = 0.06) and in municipalities in the south of the RMR (Jaboatão dos Guararapes and Cabo de Santo Agostinho) (p = 0.046). The high prevalence of recent infection and the high prevalence of non-B strains in this poor Brazilian region merit further attention.